House OKs measure called ‘most important’ pro-life bill in 10 years


WASHINGTON (CNS) — The U.S. House June 18 passed the Pain Capable Unborn Protection Act to prohibit abortion nationwide after 20 weeks of gestation, approximately the stage at which scientists say unborn babies are capable of feeling pain.

After heated debate on the floor of the Republican-led House, the bill passed early in the evening with a 228-196 vote.

“We are far outside the global mainstream” with regard to abortion, U.S. Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., a co-sponsor of the bill, said in comments on the floor earlier in the day. Smith, a Catholic, is co-chair of the Congressional Pro-Life Caucus.

“It may come as a shock to many, but according to the Americans United for Life Legal Defense Fund, the United States is one among only four nations in the world that allows abortions for any reason after viability, and is currently one of only nine nations that allows abortion after 14 weeks gestation,” he said. “That subset consists of Canada, China, Great Britain, North Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, Vietnam and the United States.”

At a morning news conference June 18, Penny Nance of Concerned Women for America called the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act “the most important pro-life bill to be considered in the last 10 years.”

Though the Democratic-controlled Senate will most likely table the passage of the bill, pro-life advocates still claimed the House vote as a victory.

Other pro-life legislation has survived a tough fight in Congress, said Marilyn Musgrave, vice president for government affairs at the Susan B. Anthony List, an organization that works to get pro-life women elected to office. She pointed to the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.

In the 1990s, Congress had twice passed a ban on partial-birth abortions. Both times the bills were vetoed by President Bill Clinton. In 2000, the Supreme Court struck down a Nebraska ban on partial-birth abortions.

In 2003, Congress again passed a ban on partial-birth abortions, and the bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush. The law withstood several court challenges on constitutional grounds, but the U.S. Supreme Court upheld it in 2007.

“I believe this bill will eventually become law,” Musgrave said about the Pain Capable Unborn Protection Act.

“A majority of Americans, including and especially women, support what we are trying to do,” said Smith before the vote. “According to the Gallup poll, 64 percent of Americans believe that abortion should not be permitted in the second three months of pregnancy. Eighty percent say abortion should not be permitted in the last three months of pregnancy.”

The poll also found, he said, that “63 percent of women believe that abortion should not be permitted after the point where substantial medical evidence says that the unborn child can feel pain.”

At a May hearing, opponents of the bill said evidence of fetal pain is unfounded and argued that a woman should be able to choose to have an abortion at any stage of pregnancy, especially in cases of fetal deformities.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony List, said June 18 that she saw the legislation as a response to the will of the American people.

“What Roe v. Wade did is put a blockade in front of every single law (about abortion). Our goal is to close that gap between the will of the people and the reality of the law,” she said at the news conference.

Nance also commented that the bill would not only protect unborn babies from a painful death but would protect women from the dangers of late-term abortion.

“We are on the right side of history today,” she said.



    A ‘friend’ of mine (I’ve worked with him in the Public School System) and we have been debating the “Pain Capable Unborn Protection Act” on facebook. This man is a devout Democrat and Obama supporter and sees everything through a political lens. I have edited and kept brief our debate for reasons of space. Let’s call my adversary in this discussion Ted.

    JO: Are you saying that the government, doctors, and all concerned should participate in a woman’s choice of abortion whether there is massive pain on the child or not? So when the fetus is forced out of the womb and is squealing, and gasping for air that’s ok with you? Just trying to understand.

    Ted: Good thing Republican legislatures aren’t trying to mandate early terminations before 20 weeks…..oh wait they are. With those stipulations they are also mandating the method used, which is a vacuuming process. This method is not used after 16 weeks pregnancy. Thanks Planned!!! (I’m sure you know there’s more than one way to skin a fetus.)

    JO: Now he compares women’s choice to buying a car.

    Ted: “It’s disingenuous to say the government has participated in the woman’s choice. I mean that’s like saying the government participated in my choice to buy a prius.”

    “None of the forced participation or violating religious beliefs about abortions is true, but Republicans go out of their way to find what they think are central issues and develop an emotional background that they can attach fiction to in the name of being an effective advocate. Not to be dismissive, but a baby’s pain is not central to this issue. Choice is central. Either clearing the way to decide freely or blocking outcomes and thus narrowing choices. c’est la vie, life goes on…”

    There you have it. Peace amigos…………..JO


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.