Three US cardinals discuss papal candidates, process of choosing pope

Pope Benedict XVI addresses the College of Cardinals at the Vatican Feb. 28, the final day of his papacy. In attendance were 144 cardinals, including many of the 115 younger than 80 who are eligible and expected to vote in the upcoming conclave. (CNS pho to/L'Osservatore Romano via Reuters)
Pope Benedict XVI addresses the College of Cardinals at the Vatican Feb. 28, the final day of his papacy. In attendance were 144 cardinals, including many of the 115 younger than 80 who are eligible and expected to vote in the upcoming conclave. (CNS pho to/L’Osservatore Romano via Reuters)

ROME (CNS) — After Pope Benedict XVI left the Vatican and began the last hours of his papacy, Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago told reporters he already was considering the qualities of certain cardinals and what kinds of pope they would make.

“I would imagine each of us has some kind of a list of primary candidates and other secondary and tertiary,” the cardinal told reporters in Rome Feb. 28 as he and fellow U.S. Cardinals Sean P. O’Malley of Boston and Daniel N. DiNardo of Galveston-Houston met the press.

Because Pope Benedict had announced his intention to resign Feb. 11, Cardinal George said, the cardinals already had begun thinking of individuals they consider good candidates.

“There’s a likely list at this point — it isn’t winnowed yet — of people who might be considered candidates,” he said.

In addition to the general meetings of the cardinals where the needs of the church are discussed, Cardinal George — who participated in the 2005 conclave that elected Pope Benedict — said there are “smaller, more intimate conversations” where the cardinals ask each other about specific cardinals they know or want to know more about.

He said they ask questions like, “What do you know about this candidate? And could you tell me how he would react to this? And what sort of person is he, what’s his personality?”

Cardinal George said the cardinals being named possible candidates in the news — “all of them that I’ve seen, unlike last time — are, in fact, good candidates.”

Asked whether Pope Benedict’s resignation at 85 would cause the cardinals to look for younger, healthier popes than they may have in the past, Cardinal O’Malley said, “I think it’s a little early to say what the long-term effect is going to be.”

He said the conclave could elect “an older man, realizing that he’s not going to have to carry on this burden into his 90s” because it would be easier to resign now that Pope Benedict has.

“Certainly, it’s a whole new ballgame after this resignation,” the Boston cardinal said.

The papacy is “an extremely demanding job,” he said, so it also “could result in the conclave choosing a younger man.”

Cardinal DiNardo said the cardinals are just coming to grips with the idea that a pope actually could resign, even though it always has been a possibility according to canon law.

At the same time, he said, the cardinals are not in the kind of rush news outlets are in and “it worries me intensely that people are making all kinds of judgments already when we’re really only at the beginning of this. I think we need to be patient. The church is patient.”

Cardinal George said the question on his mind and probably the minds of most other cardinal-electors is who would be best suited for the papacy.

“The question of where he might be from or even his age follows after that, it’s secondary, not determinative,” he said.

As for how Pope Benedict’s resignation might change people’s understanding of the papacy, Cardinal George said it is too early to know.

In a family, the father is still the father even when he is old or ailing, he said.

“Function doesn’t count in a family, relationships do,” he said. “And the church is a family, the family of God.”

Whether a person can function in the office of pope “now becomes a more important question than it was before,” he said, although it remains to be seen if that question will have a lasting impact on people’s understanding of the papacy.

– – –

Contributing to this story were Francis X. Rocca and Cindy Wooden in Rome.


  1. Isn’t it interesting that this “Catholic news” service can always showcase the new-age proponents of pseudo-catholicism, thereby according them a degree of credibility they just do not deserve.

    Take, for example, Cardinal George of Chicago. He is the fellow who still lets a demon named john fleger run around the Midwest, damning the Catholic Church and working full time to destroy it, while still calling himself a Catholic priest. He allows females who call themselves “nuns” to do the same thing. Mr. George is the former chair of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) who allowed various committees to give hundreds of millions of Catholic dollars to pro-abort, anti-Catholic groups around the globe; who allowed lay employees who headed those committees to sit as directors on various pro-abortion groups that were receiving our Catholic dollars; who had the USCCB write and distribute a voting guide booklet in 2008 that distorted Catholic doctrine and the teachings of Christ with the specific goal of leading Catholic voters to the satanic den of Barack Hussein Obama (from Chicago) and the American Party of Death; who sent his scandal-ridden protégé to the Diocese of Tucson to mislead Catholic voters while shielding the anti-Catholic pro-death politicians who call themselves Catholics; and who is allowing the City of Chicago to shut down long-standing Catholic ministries because they will not accommodate homosexual deviancy

    Or maybe Cardinal O’Malley of Boston – he is the fellow who historically allowed Massachusetts Catholics to vote for such as Edward (Floaties) Kennedy, John F’ing Kerry who served in Viet Nam, and all of the other rabidly pro-abort, pro-euthanasia politicians who have haunted his social calendar. He is the fellow who allowed the Diocese of Boston Catholic health services to refer young mothers to abort (kill) their babies. He is the fellow who promoted a HUGE CATHOLIC funeral mass and celebration for the finally late Edward Kennedy, in celebration of all of the abortions he had promoted and funded.

    I don’t know about Cardinal DiNardo of Texas specifically, but maybe he had something to do with the bishop of Amarillo arresting Fr. Frank Pavone, the leader of Priests for Life and trying to destroy his ministry. This ministry works continually to save the lives of innocent human beings who segments of society try to kill for convenience. Fr. Pavone had to get help from the Vatican to get released back to his work. I don’t know about Cardinal DiNardo, but apparently this “catholic news” service regards him as a bird of the same feather.

    What might their agenda be in this process? Hmmmmmmm…


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.