Cardinal praises conscience provisions in House appropriations bill

WASHINGTON (CNS) — The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Pro-Life Activities praised lawmakers for including two conscience provisions in the House version of the 2013 appropriations bill for the federal departments of Labor and Health and Human Services.

“Our government has a long history of respecting rights of conscience in health care, and the time is long overdue to reaffirm this laudable tradition in the face of today's growing threats,” Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo of Galveston-Houston said in a July 17 letter to members of the House Subcommittee on Labor/HHS.

Cardinal DiNardo said the provision called the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act, which had 124 co-sponsors from both parties, “will reaffirm the basic principle that no health care entity should be forced by government to perform, participate in or pay for abortions.”

The other provision is the Respect for Right of Conscience Act, which Cardinal DiNardo said would “counter a policy that poses the most direct federal threat to religious freedom in recent memory,” a reference to the “HHS mandate” requiring most religious organizations to include sterilizations and contraceptive coverage — including those that could cause early abortions — in their employee health care plans.

The subcommittee was preparing to mark up the appropriations bill for eventual action by the House Appropriations Committee and then the full House. The Senate Appropriations Committee had done its own markup, first in subcommittee and then in full committee, June 12 and 14.

“The endgame for a final appropriations bill is unknown at this time, but agreement between the two houses of Congress is likely to be late fall or early winter at the earliest,” said a June 18 statement from Directors of Health Promotion and Education, a trade group.

In his July 17 letter, Cardinal DiNardo said inclusion of the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act “will provide urgently needed relief” by codifying the Hyde-Weldon amendment, which has been part of Labor-HHS appropriations packages since 2004, and will enhance “its enforceability” by closing loopholes and providing victims of discrimination with a “private right of action” to defend their rights in court.

Currently, Hyde-Weldon “can only be enforced by lodging a complaint with the Department of Health and Human Services, which in recent years has given a low priority to such claims and sometimes has itself been the perpetrator of discrimination,” Cardinal DiNardo said.

“Hyde-Weldon's only stated penalty for violations is the denial of all Labor-HHS funds to a state or other governmental entity, which has been criticized as both implausible and subject to legal challenge,” he added. “Some states implementing the Affordable Care Act have begun to claim that they can force all private health plans on their exchanges to cover elective abortion as an 'essential health benefit.'”

The HHS mandate was characterized by Cardinal DiNardo as “disregarding all moral and religious objections by the insurer, employer or other sponsor, female employee, or parent of minor children.”

The Respect for Rights of Conscience Act has 224 House co-sponsors. Cardinal DiNardo said that while nearly half the Senate supported it this spring in a preliminary vote, it failed to achieve a majority because of “'red herring' arguments that it would reverse existing protections against discriminatory withholding of health coverage from pregnant women, racial minorities or people with disabilities.”

“These arguments were demonstrably false, as the legislation leaves in place all existing protections in these areas,” he said. “In fact it maintains the current status quo, as its only effect is to allow an opt-out on moral or religious grounds from the new benefits mandates to be created for the first time by the Affordable Care Act itself.”

jfdghjhthit45